Pretty Woman (1990) is widely considered
one of the most successful romantic-comedy films of all time, and helped set
many of the standards for the genre.
The film tells the story of Edward Lewis (Richard Gere), an outrageously
wealthy businessman whose job is to buy down-and-out companies, break them into
pieces, and sell them off for a profit.
While on a business trip to LA, Edward’s girlfriend leaves him over the
phone leading him to borrow his lawyer’s car and drive around to clear his
head. While on Hollywood
Boulevard, Edward asks a young prostitute named Vivian (Julia Roberts) for
directions to Beverly Hills.
Edward then hires Vivian to stay with him for the week as an escort to
accompany him to social engagements.
The rest of the film follows the romance that develops from what was
initially a simple business agreement between the two protagonists. Pretty
Woman explores the striking differences between social classes and the
difficulty in bridging those gaps.
The film also discusses the degree to which portrayals of sex and
sexuality are acceptable in social hierarchy. For example, Edward sends Vivian out shopping in Beverly
Hills for new clothes with his credit card, but the women in the posh clothing
store refuse to help her due to her unsophisticated attire. Vivian’s transformation from a
down-on-her-luck prostitute to a confident member of high society provides an
interesting and uplifting spin on the common “rags to riches” situation that is
present in so many stories.
The
first sign of Vivian’s empowerment comes very early in the film, when she first
gets into the car with Edward.
Edward is uncomfortable with driving a stick shift and admits that
growing up in luxury has left him with zero knowledge of cars, as he tells
Vivian “his first car was a limo.”
On the other hand, Vivian grew up around autoworkers and knows much more
about the subject, leading Edward to stop the car and ask her to drive. Driving is stereotypically considered a
masculine activity, so this scene presents an interesting common gender role
reversal from the beginning of the film.
Vivian’s competence surprises Edward, and he begins to notice her confidence
and independence, traits not stereotypically associated with prostitutes. When they reach the hotel that Edward
is staying at, Vivian does not change her fiery attitude despite the judgment
of the hotel patrons. For example,
while waiting on the elevator with Edward, Vivian notes that she is not wearing
any pantyhose, making the conservative, elderly couple standing next to them
very uncomfortable.
With
the integration of two strikingly different social classes, Pretty Woman questions the tolerance of
modern society to displays of sex and sexuality. As Michel Foucault discusses in “We Other Victorians”, the
brothel and the mental institution seemed to be the only places where
expressions of sexuality, whether it be through words or gestures, would be
tolerable. (4). Foucault mentions
this in reference to the Victorian bourgeoisie, but he also questions whether or
not we have liberated ourselves from the repression of sexuality. Based on the harsh judgment Vivian
receives from the hotel patrons and residents of Beverly Hills based on her
provocative appearance, Pretty Woman
argues that we have not. However,
Foucault continues on in his argument by drawing parallels between sex and
power. One of the reasons the
audience views Vivian as such a strong character is because she acts like
herself and has no problem discussing sex out in the open. Foucault says, “If sex is repressed,
that is, condemned to prohibition, nonexistence, and silence, then the mere
fact that one is speaking about it has the appearance of a deliberate
transgression. A person who holds
forth in such language places himself to a certain extent outside the reach of
power; he upsets established law; he somehow anticipates the coming freedom.”
(6). Vivian more or less
personifies this transgression – while working as a prostitute, she refuses to
work for a pimp and is very set in her ways about doing only what she wants
with the customers she wants.
This
connection between sex and power also applies itself to the work that Edward
does in the business world.
Throughout the film, many parallels are drawn between Edward’s work and
Vivian’s work, despite the fact that they are from polar opposite social
classes. In a way, Edward acts a
pimp for broken companies – buying them at their low points only to break them
down for a profit. By the end of
the film, witnessing Vivian’s transgression of social classes and restraints on
sexuality has changed him, and he decides not to go through with a deal to take
over another company. Vivian’s
impact on Edward ultimately prevents him from following a path of corporate
greed, and the film ends happily. Pretty Woman has an extremely uplifting
story while posing intriguing questions about social class and sexuality, and
is one of the few romantic-comedy films I
legitimately enjoy. I would
definitely recommend it if you have not seen it.
Something very modern about Pretty Woman is the way that the characters and the movie itself portrays sex. Our leading lady is a prostitute which makes a difference, but sex is seen as very casual and void of feelings when their relationship first begins. Sex is simply not seen a meaningful act in anyway while on the other hand, Vivan refuses to kiss the men that hire her because it's too intimate. As the movie progresses and the relationship between Vivan and Edward begins to grow their physical relationship begins to change. After a being together for a while, they have their first kiss and the sex that they have begins to mean something more than just physical. Pretty Woman perfectly portrays our society's modern idea that sex doesn't have to mean anything, but at times it can be very important to a relationship. Sex between two people can change depending on their relationship and situation.
ReplyDeleteI like your analysis on the way in which Vivian's "low-grade" appearance in a "high-grade" society gives her this image of empowerment, especially as a result from her lack of concern and confidence in the way she looks. One thing that I think is compelling is the way that people are expected to present themselves in certain situations. In such high class societies or even just in professional settings people are expected to dress, speak, and act a certain way. At least in American society it is not encouraged for one to "be themselves" in any situation, even though you see in television and movies that this ends up being the most helpful advice. There are certain stereotypes associated with specific appearances which make it incredibly difficult for one to be their normal selves, and this is why if one wishes to interact with those outside of their social groups, they must be willing to reform or "code switch" to become more compatible with outsiders. Sadly, there are some things which we cannot change that have negative stereotypes like our gender, however, as the movie points out there are those who resist the norms set upon them. It would be productive if people would classify people as humans first, and whatever precognition they may have of a group falls second.
ReplyDeleteI think its interesting that both Vivian's masculinity and her "low-grade" appearance were noted as being part of her empowerment. I think its interesting to consider whether Vivian's power is due to her being masculinized by the movie. She is competent, loud, and confident, and open with her sexuality, all stereotypical "male" traits. Vivian, as a woman displaying these traits, becomes more interesting to the viewer and the other characters in the movie. However, the portrayed "high-grade" society does not appear to display these traits, instead they are judgmental, uptight, and passive (qualities that have often been attributed to women). It is clear in the movie, that Vivian is preferrable to the "high-grade" society due to these traits, suggesting that the upper-society echelons have become too feminized, as contrasted by the masculine Vivian.
ReplyDeleteWhat does it mean that we focus on her masculine traits as being preferrable? Why, when we find a female character particularly laudable, is she always displaying stereotypcial male traits?
[Notably, I don't feel that these traits SHOULD be considered masculine or feminine, just that they have been in the past].
I too, enjoyed your analysis of Vivian's socio-economic status and its effect on the audience's/viewer's opinion of her. I believe that her pre- and post-Richard Gere lifestyles are vastly different not simply and exclusively in her clothing style, appearance, and look, but also in the 'feel' of her character before and after. She seems to transform and become a more powerful, confident, and driven individual that the audience/viewer can relate to or identify with.
ReplyDeleteI do think, however, that it is a shame that those status-markers are the mediums through which individuals relate to or identify with characters in movies. I think Butler's criticism of gender being socially-constructed can be more widely applied. The very status markers that we have all grown up being accustomed to are themselves socially constructed. Societal differentials like these are themselves are simply reified (make to appear naturally; without human influence) to appear normal throughout time. If we were to take a step back and view Pretty Woman with more of a sociological eye towards social constructs and their origins, there would be vastly different reactions.
In the beginning of your post you remind us that this relationship begins as a business agreement; I think it is interesting to compare the post above this about Friends With Benefits (a very recent film) to this early nineties classic. Friends With Benefits also featured a business-like arrangement concerning a sexual relationship. I find that your analysis of the relationships between sex and power is speaking to these arrangements, which has grown in popularity over the past twenty years. The fact that Vivian struggles with her role and appearance but the society reflected in Friends With Benefits seems to wholeheartedly endorse casual sexual relationships is worthy of consideration.
ReplyDelete