Based on Ken Kesey’s 1962
novel of the same name, One Flew Over the
Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) explores themes of power, conformity and mental
instability while reflecting many societal tendencies of the time period. The film’s protagonist, Randle Patrick
McMurphy (Jack Nicholson), convicted of the statutory rape of a 15-year old,
serves his sentence in a bleak mental institution governed by the iron fist of
Nurse Ratched (Louise Fletcher).
Immediately, the anti-authoritarian nature of the film is revealed as
the audience is aligned with an eclectic mix of unstable ward patients,
dehumanized by the repression of the institution. The insertion of McMurphy’s free-spirited will into Nurse
Ratched’s dictatorial regime provides the primary conflict for the film, as
McMurphy tries to help his newfound friends indulge in “real-world” activities
such as fishing, gambling and baseball.
Unlike Nurse Ratched, who subjects her patients to subtle humiliation
and constant medicine to make them “better,” McMurphy believes that discovering
one’s identity and having fun is the best way to cure a mental handicap. Though it was released in 1975, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest embodies
many of the counter-culture beliefs of the 1960s, using the mental institution
as an extended metaphor for a societal “trap.”
The
film spends a great deal of time questioning the meanings of insanity and
identity. During McMurphy’s first
meeting with the psychiatric doctor, he muses over why he has been committed,
believing that he has been deemed “crazy for not sitting there like a goddamn
vegetable.” McMurphy goes on to
admit that there is not a thing wrong with his mind. With his help, the other patients slowly begin to realize
that they are not as helpless as Nurse Ratched believes them to be. As the film progresses, the unlikely
heroes learn to rebel against Nurse Ratched’s mind-numbing routine and take
control of their own lives.
However, the end of One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest takes a slightly unexpected turn, adding a new dimension
to its philosophical statement. After
a central character commits suicide, Nurse Ratched realizes that the ward has
fallen completely out of her hands due to McMurphy’s rebellious ways, so she
has him lobotomized. Another
patient in the ward, “Chief” Bromden (Will Sampson), smothers McMurphy to death
with a pillow, believing that McMurphy would rather die than be reduced to a
vegetable. McMurphy acts as a
martyr for the rest of the patients, in that his personal identity is taken
away by the oppression of the mental institution. John Locke explores similar values in his discussions of
personal identity and consciousness in Of
Identity and Diversity.
The
question is raised as to whether McMurphy is the same person he was before the
lobotomy. He is obviously still in
the same body, and he has the ability to retain literal consciousness (so to
speak) and passively observe situations.
However, all his desires and inhibitions have been taken away, so can he
still lay claim over his own identity?
Locke begins to define personal identity by considering what a “person”
is, concluding that a “person” is “a thinking intelligent Being, that has
reason and reflection, and can consider it self as it self” (195), similar to
Descartes’ conclusions in his Second
Meditation. However, Locke
takes this argument to another level, making the assertion that substance,
whether physical or mental, has nothing to do with the personal identity of
one’s self. Locke states that,
“Nothing but consciousness can unite remote Existences into the same Person,
the Identity of Substance will never do it.” (200). As mentioned earlier, the lobotomized McMurphy is able to
stay awake, but this definition of consciousness refers to the ability to feel,
experience, and maintain control over the mind. By the end of One Flew
Over Cuckoo’s Nest, McMurphy’s forced conformity is taken to a more extreme
level than the rest of the patients, and Locke would most definitely argue that
Nurse Ratched succeeds in crushing his personal identity.
Personally,
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is
one of my favorite films ever because it mixes the perfect amount of
entertainment value and social commentary, so I would obviously recommend it to
anyone. In a realist film that
relies on stellar acting instead of intriguing settings and special effects,
the tension in the scenes with McMurphy and Nurse Ratched is remarkable to
watch. The film also features
now-famous actors such as Danny DeVito and Christopher Lloyd in more minor
roles, and I would argue that Nicholson gives one of the best performances of
his career as McMurphy.
This is another intriguing take on Locke's essay on identity, for McMurphy clearly loses his personhood and consciousness for Locke when he get's lobotomized. Although Locke does not necessarily seem to think that consciousness resides solely in the brain, clearly a lobotomization makes anyone lose all sense of self. But more intriguing question arise from this medical perspective. What if you have an injury where you forget your past? Are you the same person, with the same consciousness? Closer to home, how would this interpretation affect patients of Alzheimer's disease? Defining when someone loses consciousness and identity is a tricky and delicate task.
ReplyDeleteI am hesitant to speculate about how Locke would evaluate the protagonist's journey in light of his views on Identity. However, I agree and believe that Locke would differentiate McMurphy and 'post-lobotomy McMurphy" are not simply two separate characters--they are different in all ways. One is a conscious, conscientious, and more importantly 'present' human, the other a walking, bumbling, broken computer. Locke outlines how the body goes to the making of a man as well as the soul. In that it seems to be of value, of substance. Nonetheless, Locke further hypothesizes that the self depends on the consciousness, not on substance. Is there a suitable measure of consciousness that can be applied in the medical field at all?
ReplyDeleteI tend to think that post-lobotomy McMurphy cannot lay claim to his previous identity - or any personal identity, for that matter. As you mention, Locke defines a person as "a thinking intelligent Being," and it seems that at the close of the film, McMurphy is neither thinking nor intelligent. Although, to be fair, my knowledge of frontal lobotomies and their effects on brain activity is limited, so perhaps a type of "thinking" is still occurring within McMurphy's mind. Yet it is fairly clear that he is no longer capable of reflection, or of considering himself as a "self," thereby preventing any continuation of his former identity. If, in order to be the same person, you have to maintain a continuous succession of memories, then McMurphy is certainly not the same (though he is still the same "man," in terms of his body).
ReplyDeleteIn the story McMurphy is identified as a rebel, determined to have sole control over his life. I agree that in his lobotomy, he loses his identity because he loses the ability to rebel. He cannot think or act for himself. A lobotomy is the physical realization of loss of identity that is a general in this movie.
ReplyDeleteI think you should have elaborated on the idea that McMurphy is the extreme realization of loss of identity that all the ward's patients suffer. The false helplessness and stringent rules introduced by Nurse Ratched have placed the other patients within a psychological prison. Unlike McMurphy, the vast majority of patients were voluntarily committed. The asylum does not imprison them, they are free to leave anytime. Instead they are chained by their inability to think and act as individuals. McMurphy serves as a physical symbol for the psychological struggle of the other patients. He is imprisoned by walls and his identity is taken physically and forcibly from him. The other patients are trapped by their own fears and their identity is lost in continued conformity to the rules of Nurse Ratched. To me, this is the most important theme in the movie.