In René
Descartes Second Meditation he says,
“I suppose, then, that all the things that I see are false, I persuade myself
that nothing has ever existed of all that my fallacious memory represents to
me” (133). In the Truman show, he finds himself believing that the world around
him is the real world, however he is being tricked. Would Truman have been
better off believing Descartes’ words? Even Truman’s childhood memories are
fabricated although he does not see them as fake. Descartes, in his Second Meditation, attempts to question
how he is supposed to understand the world around him as real. Through inquiry
and thinking Descartes knows himself (his mind) to be real, however Descartes still
has uncertainty about the world around him. The example of the wax shows
perceiving something is what must first happen in order to know what something
is, and the next step is by means of the external senses or common senses so
that one can more clearly conceive the idea of the object. In The Truman Show Truman perceives the
world around him to be sincere because he is mislead by a great deceiver
(Chistof). Truman cannot even trust his external senses or common senses since
the world around Truman is a meticulous filming set.
Descartes
concludes the Second Meditations by
posing that, “because it is difficult to rid oneself so promptly of an opinion
to which one was accustomed for so long, it will be well that I should halt a
little at this point….” (137). This line is interesting in relation to The Truman Show because all of Truman’s
life he was on a set in which every action and every relationship was planned
out. Eventually Truman challenges the world around him, but it takes him quite
some time before he questions the perfect world, which surrounds him. Similar
to Descartes, it takes Truman many of years to promptly rid himself of an
opinion (such as the world around him being real) to which he was accustomed to
for so long.
Now that I
have given a brief synopsis of the film and how it connects to our reading of
Descartes’ Second Meditations I ask,
how do we know the world around us isn’t fake?? Yes that sounds like a “mad”
question but as prominent philosophy Michel Foucault says in vague terms, “we
ought to study madness as experience within our culture and grasp
madness.” So I ask again, how do
we know we are not simply misguided by a great deceiver as Descartes suggests?
I assume most of us, if not all of us in the class can attempt the same thought
experience as Descartes did, which is the “cogito ergo sum” or “I think
therefore I am.” In finding that we all “are,” or that we all “exist” in a
mental form is the first step to understanding the reality around us. However,
Descartes, conversely, does not seem to pose other means of finding out any
other realities of the world. Perhaps we are simply brains in a vat? Perhaps
one or all of us are just like Truman?
If you have
not seen The Truman Show I highly
suggest it. It philosophically asks questions about the world around us, the
realities we perceive, and god. Not to mention the film is very entertaining
and interesting (I can’t forget to mention how beautiful the ‘set’ is too. It
takes place in Seaside, Florida and although it is meant to serve as an
entrapping set for Truman, it is not too shabby of a set to be stuck on). Also, I included the movie trailer for those of you whose interest I have caught.
I have not seen the film, so this question may actually be answered if I had, but if Truman is not aware that his life is a sham, how can he distinguish between what he perceives to be the truth and what is not? If Truman's knowledge is based off of this fake life he is living then, going off us Descartes' wax argument in Second Meditation, what he knows must be certain. If, however, Truman becomes aware of his "fake existence," what would he then be able to base his knowledge on? While it does seem "mad" to ask the question of whether the world around us is fake, I believe it is a valid question when looked at in a more realistic sense. For example, while Descartes claims that we can be certain of our own knowledge and understanding, how can we be certain that our ideas aren't products of our experience and thus, influenced by the people and the world arounds us?
ReplyDelete