For this week I watched The
Final Cut. I had never seen this movie before, but the story’s premise
rally drew me in. It seems to take place in either the present or the near
future. In the movie parents can purchase a Zoe implant for their child, which
develops with their brain and stores all visual memories. These memories are
storied on a hard drive, and after death they are used by cutters to craft a
rememory. Rememories serve as a sort of literal memorial to the deceased. The
footage of their life is cut down from years to create a short film
immortalizing the deceased’s most formative and poignant memories.
I thought our reading from Marx’s Alienated Labor was most
relevant to the themes of this film. In the reading from Marx, he argues that
in a political economy (meaning the kind of society that forms the basis of our
system and that of the movie) “the worker sinks to the level of a commodity”
(XXII). In The Final Cut the very
lives of those possessing a Zoe implant have become a sort of commodity. After
death, so once the individual can no longer make use of his memories or trove
of personal experience, these memories are rehashed for the consumption of
those he left behind. These private experiences are put on display for public
viewing. The rememories are catered to the desires of friends and family the
dead have left behind. That the
rememories are put on for the benefit of those surviving and not actually for
the memory of the dead is almost literally clear in viewing the rememories.
Because all the footage is from a first-person perspective, the stars of each
rememory are those that surround them. Even within one’s own rememory they
appear only as a sort of voyeur because they are never pictured. The thoughts,
emotions, and importance the Zoe user had attached to their memories was never
apparent. And as the truth of the central character, Alan’s inner turmoil is
revealed, the true memories rarely correspond perfectly to factual experience.
So the memories of the Zoe are memories without meaning.
In the film the Zoe is incredibly popular. It is mentioned
that one in every twenty people has a Zoe implant and their popularity
continues to increase. In this world memory is a commodity and every
experience, no matter how trivial, is bound to be on record. In this sense, The Final Cut expresses our current
cultural dilemma between our growing ability and desire to record our
experience and a growing paranoia that in light of technology, genuine
experience is fading. Marx articulates this idea in economic terms: “The worker
puts his life into the object; but now his life no longer belongs to him but to
the object. Hence, the greater this activity, the more the worker lacks objects”
(XXII). Those with Zoe implants quite literally put their life into their final
product, which is their life’s footage. The more focus there is put on the
importance of recording experience, the less each individual remembers for
themself and less they experience for themself. Thus, the Zoe will lead of to
what Marx would consider ultimate servitude: “…the worker becomes a servant of
his object…The height of this servitude is that it is only as a worker that he can maintain himself as a
physical subject and it is only as a physical subject that he is a worker.”
(XXIII). In a way, Alan, at least before the revelation of his own Zoe, is a
literal example of this living for others that Marx sees as the only possible
product of this kind of culture. Alan is a cutter, and his life is his work.
But his work is the lives of others. He has spent his adult life troweling
through the experience of others. There is no room in this life for his own
experience.
The Zoe’s success rides on the human desire to live on
through our actions in the memory of others. The Zoe spokesperson even spells
it out for us in explaining the benefits of the product: “What does that mean?
Immoratlity.” He lingers on the word immortality, playing on our natural desire
to dodge death’s oblivion, our fear that we lived and died for nothing. Oddly,
but fittingly, Alan, who spent his life cutting, dies for the cause that will
end the intellectual dark age of Zoe’s wake, and as Fletcher flips through the
footage of Alan’s life and the movie fades out he says, “Your life will mean
something I promise.” These closing words promise a future of genuine experience
and genuine remembrance.
First I must admit that I did not watch this film this week, but I would like to comment on the first point you make. While I agree that this device as you have described it could easily be viewed as commodification of an individual, it also seems to be expressing a common theme in human grief processes as a whole. You argue that these films are for the benefit of those who are left behind, but this is the case of all grieving processes and practices associated with death. A reductionalist theory about all religious burial rites is that these rituals function to ease the psychological grief of the living (as opposed to the theological claims that argue that religious burial rites are meant to confirm a postmortem destination for the soul or spirit of the individual). Again, I hear where you are coming from using a Marxist approach, but additionally acknowledging the nature of all grieving processes in this way might be interesting. (I'll have to put this film on my Netflix queue to learn more about this device!)
ReplyDelete