This is my fourth time watching the Prestige
and, while I don’t pretend to have every single plot twist worked out, the plot
twists of this film aren’t what I find most fascinating about the film. What
interested me most about this film when I first viewed it originally and still
captivates me is the transported man. It is not simply the magic trick of the
transported man however; it is the reactions of Angier and Cutter, and the
subsequent strife it creates between them.
Angier’s reaction to seeing the illusion
is not only to exclaim that it is the greatest magic trick he has ever seen,
but also refusal to accept the notion that the trick is preformed using a
double as Cutter claims. What interests me most about this continued exchange
between two characters is that it is, keeping in mind Lock’s discussion of
identity, akin to a conversation between two platonic interlocutors entrenched
in debate.
The
first comment that Cutter makes about the Transported man is that it is simple.
He informs a flabbergasted Angier, who notes he has just seen the greatest
magic trick ever preformed, that the secret of the act requires little more
than a stunt double. Angier passionately rejects this claim arguing that the
“double” was not just a imposter but indeed Borden himself. The trouble is, Angier
also agrees that for him to transport himself is impossible. Here, Angier is
pointing out the same argument made by Lock that all the particles of Borden’s
matter are identical in both cases, thus negating Cutter’s double theory.
Seemingly
proven wrong, Cutter admits he cannot duplicate the Transported man without a
double. Unfortunately for Angier when he acts on this advice, the resulting
performance of “The Great Danton” ultimately fails. At this point, Angier goes
to find Tessla and figure out what has become his greatest obsession, the
mystery of the transported man. As we know, what Angier discovers is that the
machine is not only a teleportation device, but in addition to transportation
the machine duplicates the subject. In this way, Angier has solved his first
problem of understanding how Borden can be in two places at once.
It
is not until much later in the film that Borden’s true secret is revealed
however and we finally see that Cutter was right all along. Namely, the trick
only required a double. While Fallon was an identical mass of atoms at the time
of his conception, we learn that Borden and he were separated by space, which
as Lock informs us makes all of the difference. By affirming that the mass of
atoms, however identical, are separated by space proves that they are in fact
not the same being. While it is true that at the time of Fallon’s genesis both
he and Borden were the same mass of atoms, this separation of space affirms
that they are not entirely identical.
What
the machine seems to have reproduced, but not duplicated, according to Lock,
must have been the soul. This puzzled me for a long while after watching the
Prestige. It is the notion that these two men can be the exact same person, but
not be bound to the same actions. For example, while it makes little sense that
Fallon would be a marionette that simply duplicates Borden’s actions, it does
seem plausible that Fallon would be a kind of tabula rasa that simply took
Borden’s orders. I thought it was even more likely that he would be, as a
complete and exact clone, inclined to the same tendencies and motivations as
Borden. This, as we learn by their having truly loved two different women, is
not the case and they were indeed, lock would claim, separate souls.
This
is because; more important than the arrangement of atoms, according to Lock
what constitutes an Identity is the prolonged contribution of the subject in a
life or continued series of events. While Lock had not seen the Prestige he have given us a similar
example of a man becoming trapped in his hogs’ body. He claims that if this were to happen, we would call such a
hog by the name of the man who inhabits the animal shell. In the same was,
Fallon is addressed as such through out the entire film, he loves a different
woman, and has an existence independent of Borden’s: He is a unique soul in
another’s body. In this way, Lock finally sheds light my question about the Prestige, and settles the argument
between Borden and Cutter simultaneously.
When I watched the film this time,
however, another question arose: Is the Angier we meet at the beginning of the
film the same one who we see in the last scene of the film? I don’t know that
this was intended to be ambiguous, however, it is still unclear to me. At the
end of the film, Angier exclaims that he never knew weather he was going to be
the one in the box at the end of the night, and indeed in some instances he
seems to imply that he was. However, since we know that they used the same
duplication method as Borden and Borden was not the same identity as his
duplicate, is it possible for this Angier to be the same one as the one we saw
at the beginning of the film, considering of course that the Angier who went through
the trap door was random? Is this a plot hole, or has someone else figured it
out?
I believe that your final question has shown to be a hole in the plot, for I too had a similar question as to how the newer model of Angier (for we know that Angier had copied himself and killed himself multiple times by the final scene) seemed to be so alike in regards to obsession and passion. If we know that Borden and Fallon are capable of sharing mimetic mass and yet maintain different identities, how is it that Angier has the same identity (or at least behaves as though he is similar) throughout the entire film? Is it true that the "real" Angier happened to survive every duplication process and managed to kill every double of his? Or does his soul or identity never change because it doesn't need to? I point to Borden and Fallon for being a situation in which the identity of both men needed to be altered in such a way that with both men there is one soul, each only having half of a full consciousness. Or as Dostoevsky would say, a Double. I hope to have been able to provide some more thoughts on your question, but I will end with this: If someone were to murder their own clone, would they lose a part of themselves in the process?
ReplyDeleteI do completely understand the confusion of why the Angier replicas all seem to be the same while Borden and Fallon are different people but i do think that there could be another explanation. The way I understood it is that at the moment of cloning the now two separate bodies are the exact same entity in their personality, memories, and priorities. As soon as the separation is complete the bodies begin to live different lives and therefore begin to split from their counterpart both physically and mentally. Angier immediately kills off these new and not threatening doubles so the bodies have no time to develop separately. Borden on the other hand, creates his clone and sees him not as a threat, but as a partner. As Borden and Fallon begin to develop as separate people, they also begin to separate in identity. The men, while identical, fall in love with different women and begin to want different things. The more time that passes, the more different Boden and Fallon become because they are experiencing more and more separately. Angier's replica's never differed from the original Angier because there was nothing to separate from.
ReplyDelete